Just a note about using the continue statement to forego the remainder of a loop - be SURE you're not issuing the continue statement from within a SWITCH case - doing so will not continue the while loop, but rather the switch statement itself.
While that may seem obvious to some, it took a little bit of testing for me, so hopefully this helps someone else.
while
(PHP 4, PHP 5, PHP 7)
while loops are the simplest type of loop in PHP. They behave just like their C counterparts. The basic form of a while statement is:
while (expr)
statement
The meaning of a while statement is simple. It
tells PHP to execute the nested statement(s) repeatedly, as long
as the while expression evaluates to
TRUE. The value of the expression is checked
each time at the beginning of the loop, so even if this value
changes during the execution of the nested statement(s), execution
will not stop until the end of the iteration (each time PHP runs
the statements in the loop is one iteration). Sometimes, if the
while expression evaluates to
FALSE from the very beginning, the nested
statement(s) won't even be run once.
Like with the if statement, you can group multiple statements within the same while loop by surrounding a group of statements with curly braces, or by using the alternate syntax:
while (expr):
statement
...
endwhile;
The following examples are identical, and both print the numbers 1 through 10:
<?php
/* example 1 */
$i = 1;
while ($i <= 10) {
echo $i++; /* the printed value would be
$i before the increment
(post-increment) */
}
/* example 2 */
$i = 1;
while ($i <= 10):
echo $i;
$i++;
endwhile;
?>
add a note
User Contributed Notes 20 notes
scott at mstech dot com ¶
9 years ago
nickleus at gmail dot com ¶
1 year ago
<?php
$i = -1;
while ($i) {
echo $i++;
}
?>
outputs "-1" then stops because "0" (zero) gets evaluated as FALSE.
this demonstrates why it's important for a PDO statement fetch-ing a column value inside a while-loop to test explicitly for FALSE.
mattbacq2004 at gmail dot com ¶
3 months ago
<?php
$i = 50; // number of loops
/*
the variable can
be modified: $i
*/
while(!$i ==0){
DoAnyFunction();
}
chayes at antenna dot nl ¶
16 years ago
At the end of the while (list / each) loop the array pointer will be at the end.
This means the second while loop on that array will be skipped!
You can put the array pointer back with the reset($myArray) function.
example:
<?php
$myArray=array('aa','bb','cc','dd');
while (list ($key, $val) = each ($myArray) ) echo $val;
reset($myArray);
while (list ($key, $val) = each ($myArray) ) echo $val;
?>
avenidagez at foro5 dot com ¶
4 years ago
Is strange that the manual states...
"Sometimes, if the while expression evaluates to FALSE from the very beginning, the nested statement(s) won't even be run once. "
Because it can't be SOMETIMES
If it behaves that way, then it is a bug, because it ALWAYS must not run the nested statement(s) even once if the WHILE expression evaluates to FALSE from the very beginning.
Another way to exit the while loop is by using the BREAK statement.. see it in the manual.
And if expression evaluates to NULL is the same as FALSE
while (expression evals to NULL){ }
corychristison[AT]NSPAMlavacube[dot]com ¶
14 years ago
While can do wonders if you need something to queue writing to a file while something else has access to it.
Here is my simple example:
<?php
function write ($data, $file, $write_mode="w") {
$lock = $file . ".lock";
// run the write fix, to stop any clashes that may occur
write_fix($lock);
// create a new lock file after write_fix() for this writing session
touch( $lock );
// write to your file
$open = fopen($file, $write_mode);
fwrite($open, $data);
fclose($open);
// kill your current lock
unlink($lock);
}
function write_fix ($lock_file) {
while( file_exists($lock_file){
// do something in here?
// maybe sleep for a few microseconds
// to maintain stability, if this is going to
// take a while ?? [just a suggestion]
}
}
?>
This method is not recommended for use with programs that will be needing a good few seconds to write to a file, as the while function will eat up alot of process cycles. However, this method does work, and is easy to implement. It also groups the writing functions into one easy to use function, making life easier. :-)
chris mushy ¶
13 years ago
Just a note to stuart - the reason for this behaviour is because using the while(value = each(array)) construct increments the internal counter of the array as its looped through. Therefore if you intend to repeat the loop, you need to reset the counter. eg:
$one = array("10", "20", "30", "40");
$two = array("a", "b", "c", "d");
$i=0;
while($i < count($one)) {
reset($two);
while($a = each($two)) {
echo $a[1]." - ".$one[$i].", ";
}
$i++;
}
This produces:
a - 10, b - 10, c - 10, d - 10, a - 20, b - 20, c - 20, d - 20, a - 30, b - 30, c - 30, d - 30, a - 40, b - 40, c - 40, d - 40,
er dot sarimkhan786 at gmail dot com ¶
3 years ago
simple pyramid pattern program using while loop
<?php
$i=1;
while($i<=5)
{
$j=1;
while($j<=$i)
{
echo"*  ";
$j++;
}
echo"<br>";
$i++;
}
?>
// or alternatively you can use:
<?php
$i=1;
while($i<=5):
$j=1;
while($j<=$i):
echo"*  ";
$j++;
endwhile;
echo"<br>";
$i++;
endwhile;
?>
qeremy [atta] gmail [dotta] com ¶
6 years ago
Instead of this usage;
<?php
$arr = array("orange", "banana", "apple", "raspberry");
$i = 0;
while ($i < count($arr)) {
$a = $arr[$i];
echo $a ."\n";
$i++;
}
// or
$i = 0;
$c = count($arr);
while ($i < $c) {
$a = $arr[$i];
echo $a ."\n";
$i++;
}
?>
This could be more efficient;
<?php
while ($a = $arr[1 * $i++]) echo $a ."\n";
?>
synnus at gmail dot com ¶
2 years ago
<?php
// test While Vs For php 5.6.17
$t1 = microtime(true);
$a=0;
while($a++ <= 1000000000);
$t2 = microtime(true);
$x1 = $t2 - $t1;
echo PHP_EOL,' > while($a++ <= 100000000); : ' ,$x1, 's', PHP_EOL;
$t3 = microtime(true);
for($a=0;$a <= 1000000000;$a++);
$t4 = microtime(true);
$x2 = $t4 - $t3;
echo PHP_EOL,'> for($a=0;$a <= 100000000;$a++); : ' ,$x2, 's', PHP_EOL;
$t5 = microtime(true);
$a=0; for(;$a++ <= 1000000000;);
$t6 = microtime(true);
$x3 = $t6 - $t5;
echo PHP_EOL,' > $a=0; for(;$a++ <= 100000000;); : ' , $x3, 's', PHP_EOL;
//> while($a++ <= 100000000); = 18.509671926498s
//
//> for($a=0;$a <= 100000000;$a++); = 25.450572013855s
//
//> $a=0; for(;$a++ <= 100000000;); = 22.614907979965s
// ===================
//> while($a++ != 100000000); : 18.204656839371s
//
//> for($a=0;$a != 100000000;$a++); : 25.025605201721s
//
//> $a=0; for(;$a++ != 100000000;); : 22.340576887131s
// ===================
//> while($a++ < 100000000); : 18.383454084396s
//
//> for($a=0;$a < 100000000;$a++); : 25.290743112564s
//
//> $a=0; for(;$a++ < 100000000;); : 23.28609919548s
?>
s dot seitz at netz-haut dot de ¶
10 years ago
Due to the fact that php only interprets the necessary elements to get a result, I found it convenient to concatenate different sql queries into one statement:
<?php
$q1 = 'some query on a set of tables';
$q2 = 'similar query on a another set of tables';
if ( ($r1=mysql_query($q1)) && ($r2=mysql_query($q2)) ) {
while (($row=mysql_fetch_assoc($r1))||($row=mysql_fetch_assoc($r2))) {
/* do something with $row coming from $r1 and $r2 */
}
}
?>
[EDIT BY danbrown AT php DOT net: Contains a bugfix supplied by "Ira" on 14-AUG-09 to address an extra '(' in the leading `if` statement.]
Anonymous ¶
3 years ago
A cool way to keep evaluating something until it fails a test.
<?php
while (true) {
if ('test') { // is initial condition true
// do something that also changes initial condition
} else { // condition failed
break; // leave loop
}
}
?>
virtualjosh at yahoo dot com (Hosh) ¶
15 years ago
I made a test traversing an array (simple, but long, numeric array with numeric keys). My test had a cycle per method, and multiplied each array element by 100.. These were my results:
******************************************************
30870 Element Array Traversing
[test_time] [BEGINS/RESETS @ time_start = 1060977996.689]
0.2373 seg later -> while (list ($key, $val) = each ($array)) ENDS
[test_time] [BEGINS/RESETS @ time_start = 1060977996.9414]
0.1916 seg later -> while (list ($key,) = each ($array)) ENDS
[test_time] [BEGINS/RESETS @ time_start = 1060977997.1513]
0.1714 seg later -> foreach ($array AS $key=>$value) ENDS
[test_time] [BEGINS/RESETS @ time_start = 1060977997.3378]
0.0255 seg later -> while ($next = next($array)) ENDS
[test_time] [BEGINS/RESETS @ time_start = 1060977997.3771]
0.1735 seg later -> foreach ($array AS $value) ENDS
**************************************************************
foreach is fatser than a while (list - each), true.
However, a while(next) was faster than foreach.
These were the winning codes:
$array = $save;
test_time("",1);
foreach ($array AS $key=>$value)
$array[$key] = $array[$key] * 100;
test_time("foreach (\$array AS \$key=>\$value)");
$array = $save;
test_time("",1);
reset($array);
while ($next = next($array))
{ $key = key($array);
$array[$key] = $array[$key] * 100;
}
test_time("while (\$next = next(\$array))");
*********************************************************
The improvement seems huge, but it isnt that dramatic in real practice. Results varied... I have a very long bidimensional array, and saw no more than a 2 sec diference, but on 140+ second scripts. Notice though that you lose control of the $key value (unless you have numeric keys, which I tend to avoid), but it is not always necessary.
I generally stick to foreach. However, this time, I was getting Allowed Memory Size Exceeded errors with Apache. Remember foreach copies the original array, so this now makes two huge 2D arrays in memory and alot of work for Apache. If you are getting this error, check your loops. Dont use the whole array on a foreach. Instead get the keys and acces the cells directlly. Also, try and use unset and Referencing on the huge arrays.
Working on your array and loops is a much better workaround than saving to temporary tables and unsetting (much slower).
Niton ¶
1 year ago
@stuart.
You need to use reset($two), because your array index already left the last element and you need to reset it. Outer while iterates again but inner while executes nothing.
Anonymous ¶
13 years ago
virtualjosh at yahoo dot com (Hosh) wrote on: 16-Aug-2003 12:52
The speedtest is interesting. But the seemingly fastest way contains a pitfall for beginners who just use it because it is fast and fast is cool ;)
Walking through an array with next() will cut of the first entry, as this is the way next() works ;)
If you really need to do it this way, make sure your array contains an empty entry at the beginning. Another way would be to use
<?php
while ($this = current($array) ){
do_something($this);
next($array);
}
?>
There is an impact on speed for sure but I did not test it. I would advise to stick with conventional methods because current(),next() in while loops is too error prone for me.
Ilene Jones ¶
13 years ago
For Perl programmers, break is similar to last
while (1) {
while(cond) {
if (error) {
break 2; // in perl this could have been last;
}
}
}
dominik at deobald dot org ¶
11 years ago
@stuart:
There's nothing strange or unexpected about your loop's behaviour.
> So in effect the main while loop is only doing one iteration... and not 4 as expected....
That's the wrong conclusion. The outer "while" does all four iterations. However the "inner" loop does nothing for the second, third and fourth run.
> I think it would be good to have an explaination of this strange behaviour.
Here it is:
<?PHP
$i=0;
while($i < count($one)) {
while($a = each($two)) {
echo $a[1]." - ".$one[$i].", ";
}
$i++;
}
?>
The "problem" is your use of "each", which reached the last item after the first iteration of the outer loop. After that, when you come back to the second iteration with the outer loop, "each" still is at the end of the array $two.
If you add a reset($two) in front of the inner "while", you'll get the result you expect.
stuart ¶
13 years ago
A note to anyone nesting a while loop inside a while loop....
Consider the example below:
$one = array("10", "20", "30", "40");
$two = array("a", "b", "c", "d");
$i=0;
while($i < count($one)) {
while($a = each($two)) {
echo $a[1]." - ".$one[$i].", ";
}
$i++;
}
This will return the following:
a - 10, b - 10, c - 10, d - 10
So in effect the main while loop is only doing one iteration... and not 4 as expected....
Now the example below works as expected..
$i=0;
while($i < count($one)) {
foreach($two as $a) {
echo $a." - ".$one[$i]."\n";
}
$i++;
}
by returning:
a - 10, b - 10, c - 10, d - 10, a - 20, b - 20, c - 20, d - 20, a - 30, b - 30, c - 30, d - 30, a - 40, b - 40, c - 40, d - 40
So there is clearly a difference on how while statements work in comparison to other looping structures.
I think it would be good to have an explaination of this strange behaviour.
ravenswd at gmail dot com ¶
8 years ago
I find it often clearer to set a simple flag ($finished) to false at the start of the loop, and have the program set it to true when it's finished doing whatever it's trying to do. Then the code is more self-documenting: WHILE NOT FINISHED keep going through the loop. FINISHED EQUALS TRUE when you're done. Here's an example. This is the code I use to generate a random filename and ensure that there is not already an existing file with the same name. I've added very verbose comments to it to make it clear how it works:
<?php
$finaldir = 'download';
$finished = false; // we're not finished yet (we just started)
while ( ! $finished ): // while not finished
$rn = rand(); // random number
$outfile = $finaldir.'/'.$rn.'.gif'; // output file name
if ( ! file_exists($outfile) ): // if file DOES NOT exist...
$finished = true; // ...we are finished
endif;
endwhile; // (if not finished, re-start WHILE loop)
?>
